This is not to deny or to belittle, however, the claims we have already made. The fact that individual and special problems of sexuality can be considered, presented and discussed with increasing frankness in popular and public media is in itself a significant breakthrough. Recognition of a condition, and discussion, either for or against, that condition must precede any change. The advantages and opportunities which are now presented to the various homophile movements, to the homophile press, and to the discerning homosexual have never been so great, and they should be exploited to the fullest. This is no time for timidity, but neither is it the time to give offense or to take unnecessary risks. We are, quite possibly, on the threshold of an era in which we can hope to accomplish goals undreamed of ten years ago if we act boldly and aggressively. But, never, in our opinion has it been more important for all of us, organized groups, publications, and, particularly, individuals, to conduct ourselves with discretion, common sense, and, above all, good taste.

Marcel Martin, Associate Editor

Gentle Sir

Love is not love that ponders what men think, Or pauses to observe amenities.

It is a desert wanderer mad to drink;

It is fanatic, full of frailties.

Love has no pattern hard and fast-

May bind a maid to maid or man to man.

It may be transient or forever last, And no less passionate though under ban.

Love is amoral. It is holy fire

Burning upon the hearthstone of the heart. A gift and giving, it is not for hire,

Nor is dissuaded when it will depart.

If

you would bring our love into fruition, Accept then, Gentle Sir, this definition.

James Ramp

5